Pat,
No, its not (unless I missed something our there in the literature). The issue is that you will not have any repeated positive observations by any observer, when they see it once, they are done collecting P/A data, so you get encounter histories that look like (1...) or (01..) or (0001), so estimating survey-specific detection probability is out as there are no histories that go 1010, or 1101 on which to base the survey-specific, observer specific detection estimates (this is detailed in MacKenzie et al. 2006 on 102-103, 175-178).
You might (untested) be able to set up a constraint, maybe setting

constant and estimate a detection value at the observer level using observer treating observer as a individual covariate, but it would not be survey-specific.
Bret