I am having some trouble understanding an application of the delta method. Sorry in advance, as I'm a newbie to this method and could be way off here .

I’ve fit a set of CJS models in Rmark and have used model averaging (given low dAIC scores between the top-ranked models), which has generated estimates of survival for a treatment and control group. The models also include a few other covariates but the main question is whether the survival estimates are different between the treatment and control groups. Model averaging results in a total of 4 unique estimates of Phi (for treatment and control groups, while also controlling for another categorical covariate with 2 levels).

A reviewer has asked that I use the delta method to generate 95% confidence intervals for the survival estimates in order “to clearly show that the estimates actually differ” for treatment/control groups. So, I’m using the deltamethod function in R, implementing the following lines of code which is based on code from these documents: http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/doc ... /app_3.pdf http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/doc ... /app_3.pdf

- Code: Select all
`#(note that taking indices 1, 37, 64, and 100 just results in extracting the 4 unique estimates of Phi).`

cjs.mods <- collect.models(type="CJS")

Mod.Avg.Phi <- model.average(cjs.mods, "Phi",vcv=T, drop=F)

betas=(Mod.Avg.Phi)$estimates

deltamethod(~exp(x1)/(1+exp(x1)),mean=betas$estimate[1],cov=betas$se[1]^2)

deltamethod(~exp(x1)/(1+exp(x1)),mean=betas$estimate[37],cov=betas$se[37]^2)

deltamethod(~exp(x1)/(1+exp(x1)),mean=betas$estimate[64],cov=betas$se[64]^2)

deltamethod(~exp(x1)/(1+exp(x1)),mean=betas$estimate[100],cov=betas$se[100]^2)

My understanding is that this will output estimates of SE for the real parameters for survival. I am then multiplying those by 1.96 to find a upper/lower confidence limits for a 95% CI around each estimate of Phi (so I take the relevant estimate of Phi from the model averaging results, e.g. 0.96, and add +/- 1.96 times the result from the relevant deltamethod output above). In doing so, I find that for treatment groups 95% confidence intervals around survival are ~ 0.89-1, whereas for control group they are ~0.5-.88. I think this gives me the information the reviewer is requesting and confirms that the two estimates “actually differ.”

My question is whether I am doing anything appropriately here or if I've gone off on a tangent based on a bad interpretation of the instruction documents. I admit that my understanding of how the delta method actually works is limited and I’m having a pretty hard time interpreting the appendix document. I’m also unsure whether I’ve integrated the model averaged estimates in appropriately.

Thank you for any assistance.