I am interested in detecting and accounting for closure violation in capture-recapture samples of Largemouth Bass collected by shoreline electrofishing. I am using CJS models to detect losses from the sampled population and Pradel reverse-time models to detect gains (to avoid having to make assumptions about unmarked fish). Sampling consisted of 3-8 electrofishing occasions spanning 8-37 days, with 3-13 days between occasions. Estimates of daily survival and recruitment might be near the boundaries of 1 and 0, but cumulative losses and gains between occasions could indicate substantial closure violation. I would normally account for unequal time intervals in MARK, but in this situation doesn't it make sense to leave the intervals all 1 rather than having MARK estimate the daily rates?
To evaluate the potential effects of closure violation, I am also comparing abundance estimates from closed-population models with model-averaged gross population estimates (N*) from POPAN models. Then, shouldn't I also leave the time intervals all 1 in the POPAN models?