wjensen1 wrote:We are using Closed Captures with "Full Likelihood p and c" and are getting different model ranks among different computers (all running Mark 9.0), and results are also changing among re-runs of model sets per the same computer. The number of parameters also sometimes automatically sets to the correct value but sometimes uses an apparent default value. Setting the number of parameters (Adjustments menu) doesn't seem to help. Additionally, the detail of Real Parameter estimates (p, c, and f(0)) sometimes varies among computers for selecting output from the same models. Please help explain. Thanks.
gwhite wrote:As you can see, the estimate of f0 is zero. Unless you are putting some constraints on the p's and c's with a design matrix, the p(t) c(t) model is not identifiable. I also see that one of the p estimates equal 1, which further suggests this model is inappropriate.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests